Friday, December 13, 2013




This time of year when the eyes turn to the red the green and gold - as the world descends into a white winter wonderland - it's nice to take a moment to think about love - peace - joy!  The way we touch the hearts of those around us.  The moment we take to wipe a tear away from a  child's cheek and let them know it will be all right.  It's a good time to remember what being a child was really like.  The little things that brought us so much joy!  It is a good time to reflect on the past years goals and successes; on the road we have been living our lives.  Has it been worth it?  Have we helped to make the world a better place?

It's the Season!  Let's celebrate and have a great time!  Joy is in the air!  Love is everywhere! Peace and goodwill to all!

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Enter...The Tao!

Many believe the Hua Hu Jing (fourth century BC) was written by Lao Tzu. Although its authorship is contested, the contents of this book are remarkable. Here is a quote:





Seventy

The cords of passion and desire weave a binding net around you. Worldly confrontation makes you stiff and inflexible. The trap of duality is tenacious. Bound, rigid, and trapped, you cannot experience liberation. Through dual cultivation it is possible to unravel the net, soften the rigidity, dismantle the trap. Dissolving your yin energy into the source of universal life, attracting the yang energy from that same source, you leave behind individuality and your life becomes pure nature. Free of ego, living naturally, working virtuously, you become filled with inexhaustible vitality and are liberated forever from the cycle of death and rebirth. Understand this if nothing else: spiritual freedom and oneness with the Tao are not randomly bestowed gifts, but the rewards of conscious self-transformation and self-evolution.



Seventy-One

The transformation toward eternal life is gradual. The heavy, gross energy of body, mind, and spirit must first be purified and uplifted. When the energy ascends to the subtle level, then self-mastery can be sought. A wise instructor teaches the powerful principles of self-integration only to those who have already achieved a high level of self-purification and self-mastery. In addition, all proper teaching follows the law of energy response: the most effective method is always that to which the student's natural energy most harmoniously responds. For one, celibacy and self-cultivation will be appropriate; for another, properly guided dual cultivation will derive the greatest benefit. A discerning teacher will determine the proper balance of practices for each individual. In any case, know that all teachers and techniques are only transitional: true realization comes from the direct merger of one's being with the divine energy of the Tao.

==========
Used By Permission
http://gnosticteachings.org/scriptures/taoist/4-hua-hu-jing.html


Saturday, July 6, 2013

Darkness Is Your Candle!...




When I first thought about this mystic saying I squinted my critical eye and recoiled in some kind of pre-historic grunt of utter disgust.  "How?" I thought to myself. "Can anyone say such a thing!?"  What hurts you is bad! devastating... crushing... destructive... and all those things we think about with great disdain.  Nothing "good" can ever rise from the ashes of hurt and loss - can it?  The questions we raise drown out the beauty which is present in the words themselves...

"Darkness is your candle!"  The world is a dark place.  Full of pain and saddness.  Destructive powers are all around us.  We shiver in the thought of something bad happening to us or worse - happenning to someone we love.  And yet when we stop and let go and follow the quiet way - the way of silence, we enter the darkness in our mind.  That spot that says, "Stop what you are doing!  Stop and listen to your heart beating."  The world within a world begins to awaken and come alive.  The night turns... into day.  The scary world of what ifs fades away and we are brought face to face with the truth.  The assurance that we seek is there in the darkness.  If we take the time to let go and realize that the "darkness is our candle" we will emerge from the darkness with a new vision full of light.  That light which comes from knowing our fears and letting our fears go...

To trust the outcome - come what may - to make the best of any situation is to know the light of love... And it is then that we learn to forgive.  We learn to accept.  And we learn that in the silence of darkness we find ourselves again.

"Darkness is your candle..."  Let it shine! Let it shine!  Let it shine!

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Life...



Life is a balancing act.  With every step we alter the reality of our existence.  We step a little bit further into the realm of the unknown.  Making something out of nothing.  Creating a life which is uniquely our own.  We can complain aabout the way things are - and we can take control of our thoughts and desires and begin to make a better world for ourselves and for those around us.  Yes - we are the creators of our own destiny.  The fabric of our lives is woven one thread at a time.  In small ways, big changes can be acheived.  We know we all have limits to how far we can go in life, and yet the sky is the limit for us if we just believe and hold on to that which is unseen...
Like an ocean, our lives are limitless.  The distant shore beckons us to take that leap of faith.  It calls to us to "Come home!"  Life is a balancing act.  With every step we take we are making a character which will carry us into the vast unknown... Eternity is ours for the taking!  Dream big!  Reach for the stars!  Become one with the universe.  Smile! And the gods of all creation will smile too.

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Finding GOD...





Amit Goswami, Ph.D.
theoretical quantum physicist

Oct 15, 2008 Scientific Proof of the Existence of God

An interview with Dr. Amit Goswami

by Craig Hamilton



Before you read any further, stop and close your eyes for a moment. Now consider the following question: for the moment your eyes were closed, did the world still exist even though you weren’t conscious of it? How do you know? If this sounds like the kind of unanswerable brain teaser your Philosophy 101 professor used to employ to stretch your philosophical imagination, you might be surprised to discover that there are actually physicists at reputable universities who believe they have answered this question—and their answer, believe it or not, is no.

Now consider something even more intriguing. Imagine for a moment the entire history of the universe. According to all the data scientists have been able to gather, it exploded into existence some fifteen billion years ago, setting the stage for a cosmic dance of energy and light that continues to this day. Now imagine the history of planet Earth. An amorphous cloud of dust emerging out of that primordial fireball, it slowly coalesced into a solid orb, found its way into gravitational orbit around the sun, and through a complex interaction of light and gases over billions of years, generated an atmosphere and a biosphere capable of not only giving birth to, but sustaining and proliferating, life.

Now imagine that none of the above ever happened. Consider instead the possibility that the entire story only existed as an abstract potential—a cosmic dream among countless other cosmic dreams—until, in that dream, life somehow evolved to the point that a conscious, sentient being came into existence. At that moment, solely because of the conscious observation of that individual, the entire universe, including all of the history leading up to that point, suddenly came into being. Until that moment, nothing had actually ever happened. In that moment, fifteen billion years happened. If this sounds like nothing more than a complicated backdrop for a science fiction story or a secular version of one of the world’s great creation myths, hold on to your hat. According to physicist Amit Goswami, the above description is a scientifically viable explanation of how the universe came into being.

 

Goswami is convinced, along with a number of others who subscribe to the same view, that the universe, in order to exist, requires a conscious sentient being to be aware of it. Without an observer, he claims, it only exists as a possibility. And as they say in the world of science, Goswami has done his math. Marshalling evidence from recent research in cognitive psychology, biology, parapsychology and quantum physics, and leaning heavily on the ancient mystical traditions of the world, Goswami is building a case for a new paradigm that he calls “monistic idealism,” the view that consciousness, not matter, is the foundation of everything that is.



A professor of physics at the University of Oregon and a member of its Institute of Theoretical Science, Dr. Goswami is part of a growing body of renegade scientists who in recent years have ventured into the domain of the spiritual in an attempt both to interpret the seemingly inexplicable findings of their experiments and to validate their intuitions about the existence of a spiritual dimension of life. The culmination of Goswami’s own work is his book The Self-Aware Universe: How Consciousness Creates the Material World. Rooted in an interpretation of the experimental data of quantum physics (the physics of elementary particles), the book weaves together a myriad of findings and theories in fields from artificial intelligence to astronomy to Hindu mysticism in an attempt to show that the discoveries of modern science are in perfect accord with the deepest mystical truths.

 

Quantum physics, as well as a number of other modern sciences, he feels, is demonstrating that the essential unity underlying all of reality is a fact which can be experimentally verified. Because of the enormous implications he sees in this scientific confirmation of the spiritual, Goswami is ardently devoted to explaining his theory to as many people as possible in order to help bring about what he feels is a much needed paradigm shift. He feels that because science is now capable of validating mysticism, much that before required a leap of faith can now be empirically proven and, hence, the materialist paradigm which has dominated scientific and philosophical thought for over two hundred years can finally be called into question.


Interviewing Amit Goswami was a mind-bending and concept-challenging experience. Listening to him explain many ideas with which he seemed perfectly at home, required, for me, such a suspension of disbelief that I at times found myself having to stretch far beyond anything I had previously considered. (Goswami is also a great fan of science fiction whose first book, The Cosmic Dancers, was a look at science fiction through the eyes of a physicist.)


But whether or not one ultimately accepts some of his more esoteric theories, one has to respect the creativity and passion with which he is willing to inquire. Goswami is clearly willing to take risks with his ideas and is fervently dedicated to sharing his investigation with audiences around the world. He speaks widely at conferences and other forums about the exciting discoveries of the new science and their significance, not only for the way science is done, but for society as a whole. In India, the country of his birth, he is actively involved in a growing organized movement to bridge the gap between science and spirituality, through which he is helping to pioneer a graduate institute in “consciousness studies” based on the premise that consciousness is the ground of all being.

 

Goswami is considered by some to be a pioneer in his field. By attempting to bring material realism to its knees and to integrate all fields of knowledge in a single unified paradigm, he hopes to pave the way for a new holistic worldview in which spirit is put first. In fact, as far as we know, he is the only new paradigm scientist who is taking a clear stand against the relativism so popular among new age thinkers. At a time when the decay of human values and the erosion of any sense of meaning has reached epidemic scale, it is hard to imagine what could be more important than this.


And yet, for all the important and valuable work he seems to be doing, in the end we are left with serious reservations as to whether Goswami’s approach will ultimately lead to the kind of transformation he hopes for. Thinkers such as Huston Smith and E. F. Schumacher have pointed to what they feel is an arrogance, or at least, a kind of naiveté, on the part of scientists who believe they can expand the reach of their discipline to somehow include or explain the spiritual dimension of life. Such critics suggest that the very attempt to scientifically validate the spiritual is itself a product of the same materialistic impulses it intends to uproot and, because of this, is ultimately only capable of reducing spirit, God and the transcendent to mere objects of scientific fascination.


Is science capable of proving the reality of the transcendent dimension of life? Or would science better serve the spiritual potential of the human race by acknowledging the inherent limits of its domain? The following interview confronts us with these questions.


Interview



WIE: In your book The Self-Aware Universe you speak about the need for a paradigm shift. Could you talk a bit about how you conceive of that shift? From what to what?



Amit Goswami: The current worldview has it that everything is made of matter, and everything can be reduced to the elementary particles of matter, the basic constituents—building blocks—of matter. And causearises from the interactions of these basic building blocks or elementary particles; elementary particles make atoms, atoms make molecules, molecules make cells, and cells make brain. But all the way, the ultimate cause is always the interactions between the elementary particles. This is the belief—all cause moves from the elementary particles. This is what we call “upward causation.” So in this view, what human beings—you and I—think of as our free will does not really exist. It is only an epiphenomenon or secondary phenomenon, secondary to the causal power of matter. And any causal power that we seem to be able to exert on matter is just an illusion. This is the current paradigm.



Now, the opposite view is that everything starts with consciousness. That is, consciousness is the ground of all being. In this view, consciousness imposes “downward causation.” In other words, our free will is real. When we act in the world we really are acting with causal power. This view does not deny that matter also has causal potency—it does not deny that there is causal power from elementary particles upward, so there is upward causation—but in addition it insists that there is also downward causation. It shows up in our creativity and acts of free will, or when we make moral decisions. In those occasions we are actually witnessing downward causation by consciousness.



WIE: In your book you refer to this new paradigm as “monistic idealism.” And you also suggest that science seems to be verifying what a lot of mystics have said throughout history—that science’s current findings seem to be parallel to the essence of the perennial spiritual teaching.



AG: It is the spiritual teaching. It is not just parallel. The idea that consciousness is the ground of being is the basis of all spiritual traditions, as it is for the philosophy of monistic idealism—although I have given it a somewhat new name. The reason for my choice of the name is that, in the West, there is a philosophy called “idealism” which is opposed to the philosophy of “material realism,” which holds that only matter is real. Idealism says no, consciousness is the only real thing. But in the West that kind of idealism has usually meant something that is really dualism—that is, consciousness and matter are separate. So, by monistic idealism, I made it clear that, no, I don’t mean that dualistic kind of Western idealism, but really a monistic idealism, which has existed in the West, but only in the esoteric spiritual traditions. Whereas in the East this is the mainstream philosophy. In Buddhism, or in Hinduism where it is called Vedanta, or in Taoism, this is the philosophy of everyone. But in the West this is a very esoteric tradition, only known and adhered to by very astute philosophers, the people who have really delved deeply into the nature of reality.



WIE: What you are saying is that modern science, from a completely different angle—not assuming anything about the existence of a spiritual dimension of life—has somehow come back around, and is finding itself in agreement with that view as a result of its own discoveries.



AG: That’s right. And this is not entirely unexpected. Starting from the beginning of quantum physics, which began in the year 1900 and then became full-fledged in 1925 when the equations of quantum mechanics were discovered, quantum physics has given us indications that the worldview might change. Staunch materialist physicists have loved to compare the classical worldview and the quantum worldview. Of course, they wouldn’t go so far as to abandon the idea that there is only upward causation and that matter is supreme, but the fact remains that they saw in quantum physics some great paradigm changing potential. And then what happened was that, starting in 1982, results started coming in from laboratory experiments in physics. That is the year when, in France, Alain Aspect and his collaborators performed the great experiment that conclusively established the veracity of the spiritual notions, and particularly the notion of transcendence. Should I go into a little bit of detail about Aspect’s experiment?



WIE: Yes, please do.



AG: To give a little background, what had been happening was that for many years quantum physics had been giving indications that there are levels of reality other than the material level. How it started happening first was that quantum objects—objects in quantum physics—began to be looked upon as waves of possibility. Now, initially people thought, “Oh, they are just like regular waves.” But very soon it was found out that, no, they are not waves in space and time. They cannot be called waves in space and time at all—they have properties which do not jibe with those of ordinary waves. So they began to be recognized as waves in potential,waves of possibility, and the potential was recognized as transcendent,beyond matter somehow.



But the fact that there is transcendent potential was not very clear for a long time. Then Aspect’s experiment verified that this is not just theory, there really is transcendent potential, objects really do have connections outside of space and time—outside of space and time! What happens in this experiment is that an atom emits two quanta of light, called photons, going opposite ways, and somehow these photons affect one another’s behavior at a distance, without exchanging any signals through space. Notice that: without exchanging any signals through space but instantly affecting each other. Instantaneously.



Now Einstein showed long ago that two objects can never affect each other instantly in space and time because everything must travel with a maximum speed limit, and that speed limit is the speed of light. So any influence must travel, if it travels through space, taking a finite time. This is called the idea of “locality.” Every signal is supposed to be local in the sense that it must take a finite time to travel through space. And yet, Aspect’s photons—the photons emitted by the atom in Aspect’s experiment—influence one another, at a distance, without exchanging signals because they are doing it instantaneously—they are doing it faster than the speed of light. And therefore it follows that the influence could not have traveled through space. Instead the influence must belong to a domain of reality that we must recognize as the transcendent domain of reality.



WIE: That’s fascinating. Would most physicists agree with that interpretation of his experiment?



AG: Well, physicists must agree with this interpretation of this experiment. Many times of course, physicists will take the following point of view: they will say, “Well, yeah sure, experiments. But this relationship between particles really isn’t important. We mustn’t look into any of the consequences of this transcendent domain—if it can even be interpreted that way.” In other words, they try to minimize the impact of this and still try to hold on to the idea that matter is supreme.



But in their heart they know, as is very evidenced. In 1984 or ’85, at the American Physical Society meeting at which I was present, it is said that one physicist was heard saying to another physicist that, after Aspect’s experiment, anyone who does not believe that something is really strange about the world must have rocks in his head.



WIE: So what you are saying is that from your point of view, which a number of others share, it is somehow obvious that one would have to bring in the idea of a transcendent dimension to really understand this.



AG: Yes, it is. Henry Stapp, who is a physicist at the University of California at Berkeley, says this quite explicitly in one of his papers written in 1977, that things outside of space and time affect things inside space and time. There’s just no question that that happens in the realm of quantum physics when you are dealing with quantum objects. Now of course, the crux of the matter is, the surprising thing is, that we are alwaysdealing with quantum objects because it turns out that quantum physics is the physics of every object. Whether it’s submicroscopic or it’s macroscopic, quantum physics is the only physics we’ve got. So although it’s more apparent for photons, for electrons, for the submicroscopic objects, our belief is that all reality, all manifest reality, all matter, is governed by the same laws. And if that is so, then this experiment is telling us that we should change our worldview because we, too, are quantum objects.



WIE: These are fascinating discoveries which have inspired a lot of people. A number of books have already attempted to make the link between physics and mysticism. Fritjof Capra’s The Tao of Physics and Gary Zukav’sThe Dancing Wu Li Masters have both reached many, many people. In your book, though, you mention that there was something that you felt had not yet been covered which you feel is your unique contribution to all this. Could you say something about what you are doing that is different from what has been done before in this area?



AG: I’m glad that you asked that question. This should be clarified and I will try to explicate it as clearly as I can. The early work, like The Tao of Physics, has been very important for the history of science. However, these early works, in spite of supporting the spiritual aspect of human beings, all basically held on to the material view of the world nevertheless. In other words, they did not challenge the material realists’ view that everything is made up of matter. That view was never put to any challenge by any of these early books. In fact, my book was the first one which challenged it squarely and which was still based on a rigorous explication in scientific terms. In other words, the idea that consciousness is the ground of being, of course, has existed in psychology, as transpersonal psychology, but outside of transpersonal psychology no tradition of science and no scientist has seen it so clearly.



It was my good fortune to recognize it within quantum physics, to recognize that all the paradoxes of quantum physics can be solved if we accept consciousness as the ground of being. So that was my unique contribution and, of course, this has paradigm-shifting potential because now we can truly integrate science and spirituality. In other words, with Capra and Zukav—although their books are very good—because they held on to a fundamentally materialist paradigm, the paradigm is not shifting,nor is there any real reconciliation between spirituality and science. Because if everything is ultimately material, all causal efficacy must come from matter. So consciousness is recognized, spirituality is recognized, but only as causal epiphenomena, or secondary phenomena. And an epiphenomenal consciousness is not very good. I mean, it’s not doinganything. So, although these books acknowledge our spirituality, the spirituality is ultimately coming from some sort of material interaction.



But that’s not the spirituality that Jesus talked about. That’s not the spirituality that Eastern mystics were so ecstatic about. That’s not the spirituality where a mystic recognizes and says, “I now know what reality is like, and this takes away all the unhappiness that one ever had. This is infinite, this is joy, this is consciousness.” This kind of exuberant statement that mystics make could not be made on the basis of epiphenomenal consciousness. It can be made only when one recognizes the ground of being itself, when one cognizes directly that One is All.



Now, an epiphenomenal human being would not have any such cognition. It would not make any sense to cognize that you are All. So that is what I am saying. So long as science remains on the basis of the materialist worldview, however much you try to accommodate spiritual experiences in terms of parallels or in terms of chemicals in the brain or what have you, you are not really giving up the old paradigm. You are giving up the old paradigm and fully reconciling with spirituality only when you establish science on the basis of the fundamental spiritual notion that consciousness is the ground of all being. That is what I have done in my book, and that is the beginning. But already there are some other books that are recognizing this too.



WIE: So there are people corroborating your ideas?



AG: There are people who are now coming out and recognizing the same thing, that this view is the correct way to go to explain quantum physics and also to develop science in the future. In other words, the present science has shown not only quantum paradoxes but also has shown real incompetence in explaining paradoxical and anomalous phenomena, such as parapsychology, the paranormal—even creativity. And even traditional subjects, like perception or biological evolution, have much to explain that these materialist theories don’t explain. To give you one example, in biology there is what is called the theory of punctuated equilibrium. What that means is that evolution is not only slow, as Darwin perceived, but there are also rapid epochs of evolution, which are called “punctuation marks.” But traditional biology has no explanation for this.



However, if we do science on the basis of consciousness, on the primacy of consciousness, then we can see in this phenomenon creativity, real creativity of consciousness. In other words, we can truly see that consciousness is operating creatively even in biology, even in the evolution of species. And so we can now fill up these gaps that conventional biology cannot explain with ideas which are essentially spiritual ideas, such as consciousness as the creator of the world.



WIE: This brings to mind the subtitle of your book, How Consciousness Creates the Material World. This is obviously quite a radical idea. Could you explain a bit more concretely how this actually happens in your opinion?



AG: Actually, it’s the easiest thing to explain, because in quantum physics, as I said earlier, objects are not seen as definite things, as we are used to seeing them. Newton taught us that objects are definite things, they can be seen all the time, moving in definite trajectories. Quantum physics doesn’t depict objects that way at all. In quantum physics, objects are seen as possibilities, possibility waves. Right? So then the question arises, what converts possibility into actuality? Because, when we see, we only see actual events. That’s starting with us. When you see a chair, you see an actual chair, you don’t see a possible chair.



WIE: Right—I hope so.



AG: We all hope so. Now this is called the “quantum measurement paradox.” It is a paradox because who are we to do this conversion? Because after all, in the materialist paradigm we don’t have any causal efficacy. We are nothing but the brain, which is made up of atoms and elementary particles. So how can a brain which is made up of atoms and elementary particles convert a possibility wave that it itself is? It itself is made up of the possibility waves of atoms and elementary particles, so it cannot convert its own possibility wave into actuality. This is called a paradox. Now in the new view, consciousness is the ground of being. So who converts possibility into actuality? Consciousness does, because consciousness does not obey quantum physics. Consciousness is not made of material. Consciousness is transcendent. Do you see the paradigm-changing view right here—how consciousness can be said to create the material world? The material world of quantum physics is just possibility. It is consciousness, through the conversion of possibility into actuality, that creates what we see manifest. In other words, consciousness creates the manifest world.



WIE: To be honest, when I first saw the subtitle of your book I assumed you were speaking metaphorically. But after reading the book, and speaking with you about it now, I am definitely getting the sense that you mean it much more literally than I had thought. One thing in your book that really stopped me in my tracks was your statement that, according to your interpretation, the entire physical universe only existed in a realm of countless evolving possibilities until at one point, the possibility of a conscious, sentient being arose and that, at that point, instantaneously, the entire known universe came into being, including the fifteen billion years of history leading up to that point. Do you really mean that?



AG: I mean that literally. This is what quantum physics demands. In fact, in quantum physics this is called “delayed choice.” And I have added to this concept the concept of “self-reference.” Actually the concept of delayed choice is very old. It is due to a very famous physicist named John Wheeler, but Wheeler did not see the entire thing correctly, in my opinion. He left out self-reference. The question always arises, “The universe is supposed to have existed for fifteen billion years, so if it takes consciousness to convert possibility into actuality, then how could the universe be around for so long?” Because there was no consciousness, no sentient being, biological being, carbonbased being, in that primordial fireball which is supposed to have created the universe, the big bang. But this other way of looking at things says that the universe remained in possibility until there was self-referential quantum measurement—so that is the new concept. An observer’s looking is essential in order to manifest possibility into actuality, and so only when the observer looks, only then does the entire thing become manifest—including time. So all of past time, in that respect, becomes manifest right at that moment when the first sentient being looks.



It turns out that this idea, in a very clever, very subtle way, has been around in cosmology and astronomy under the guise of a principle called the “anthropic principle.” That is, the idea has been growing among astronomers—cosmologists anyway—that the universe has a purpose. It is so fine-tuned, there are so many coincidences, that it seems very likely that the universe is doing something purposive, as if the universe is growing in such a way that a sentient being will arise at some point.



WIE: So you feel there’s a kind of purposiveness to the way the universe is evolving; that, in a sense, it reaches its fruition in us, in human beings?



AG: Well, human beings may not be the end of it, but certainly they are the first fruition, because here is then the possibility of manifest creativity, creativity in the sentient being itself. The animals are certainly sentient, but they are not creative in the sense that we are. So human beings certainly right now seem to be an epitome, but this may not be the final epitome. I think we have a long way to go and there is a long evolution to occur yet.



WIE: In your book you even go so far as to suggest that the cosmos was created for our sake.



AG: Absolutely. But it means sentient beings, for the sake of all sentient beings. And the universe is us. That’s very clear. The universe is self-aware, but it is self-aware through us. We are the meaning of the universe. We are not the geographical center of the universe—Copernicus was right about that—but we are the meaning center of the universe.



WIE: Through us the universe finds its meaning?



AG: Through sentient beings. And that doesn’t have to be anthropocentric in the sense of only earthlings. There could be beings, sentient beings on other planets, in other stars—in fact I am convinced that there are—and that’s completely consonant with this theory.



WIE: This human-centered—or even sentient-being-centered—stance seems quite radical at a time when so much of modern progressive thought, across disciplines from ecology to feminism to systems theory, is going in the opposite direction. These perspectives point more toward interconnectedness or interrelatedness, in which the significance of any one part of the whole—including one species, such as the human species—is being de-emphasized. Your view seems to hark back to a more traditional, almost biblical kind of idea. How would you respond to proponents of the prevailing “nonhierarchical” paradigm?



AG: It’s the difference between the perennial philosophy that we are talking about, monistic idealism, and what is called a kind of pantheism. That is, these views—which I call “ecological worldviews” and which Ken Wilber calls the same thing—are actually denigrating God by seeing God as limited to the immanent reality. On the face of it, this sounds good because everything becomes divine—the rocks, the trees, all the way to human beings, and they are all equal and they are all divinity—it sounds fine, but it certainly does not adhere to what the spiritual teachers knew. In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna says to Arjuna, “All these things are in me, but I am not in them.” What does he mean by that? What he means is that “I am not exclusively in them.”



So there is evolution, in other words, in the manifest reality. Evolutionhappens. That means that the amoeba is, of course, a manifestation of consciousness, and so is the human being. But they are not in the same stage. Evolutionarily, yes, we are ahead of the amoeba. And these theories, these ecological-worldview people, they don’t see that. They don’t rightly understand what evolution is because they are ignoring the transcendent dimension, they are ignoring the purposiveness of the universe, the creative play. Ken Wilber makes this point very, very well in his book Sex, Ecology, Spirituality.



WIE: So you would say they have part of the picture but that without this other aspect that you are bringing in, their view is very—



AG: It’s very limited. And that’s why pantheism is very limited. When Westerners started going to India, they thought it was pantheistic because it has many, many gods. Indian philosophy tends to see God in nature, in many things—they worship rocks sometimes, that kind of thing—so they thought it was pantheistic and only somewhat later did they realize that there is a transcendent dimension. In fact, the transcendent dimension is developed extremely well in Indian philosophy, whereas the transcendent dimension in the West is hidden in the cave of a very few esoteric systems such as the Gnostics and a few great masters like Meister Eckhart. In Jesus’ teachings you can see it in the Gospel according to Thomas. But you have to really dig deep to find that thread in the West. In India, in the Upanishads and the Vedanta and the Bhagavad Gita, it is very much explicit. Now, pantheism sounds very good. But it’s only part of the story. It’s a good way to worship, it’s a good way to bring spirituality into your daily life, because it is good to acknowledge that there is spirit in everything. But if we just see the diversity, see the God in everything, but don’t see the God which is beyond every particular thing, then we are not realizing our potential. We are not realizing our Self. And so, truly, Self-realization involves seeing this pantheistic aspect of reality, but also seeing the transcendent aspect of reality.



WIE: In addition to being a scientist, you are also a spiritual practitioner. Could you talk a little bit about what brought you to spirituality?



AG: Well, I’m afraid that is a pretty usual, almost classic, case. The ideal classic case, of course, is the famous case of the Buddha, who recognized at the age of twenty-nine that all of his pleasure as a prince was really a waste of time because there is suffering in the world. For me it was not that drastic, but when I was about thirty-seven the world started to fall apart on me. I lost my research grant, I had a divorce and I was very lonely. And the professional pleasure that I used to get by writing physics papers stopped being pleasure.



I remember one time when I was at a conference and all day I had been going around, beating my own drums and arguing with people. Then in the evening when I was alone, I felt so lonely. And I realized that I had heartburn, and I had already exhausted a full bottle of Tums and still it would not go away. I discovered suffering; I discovered suffering literally. And it is that discovery of suffering that brought me to spirituality, because I couldn’t think of anything else. I couldn’t think of any other way—although I had given up the idea of God entirely and had been a materialist physicist for quite some time. In fact, when my young children asked me one time, “Are you an atheist?” I said something like, “Yeah.” And, “Is there a God?” And I said, “No, I don’t believe in God.” That kind of thing was quite common for me to say. But in that era, around thirty-seven, that particular world—where God didn’t exist and where the meaning of life came just from brain-pursuits of glory in a profession—just did not satisfy me and did not bring happiness. In fact it was full of suffering. So I came to meditation. I wanted to see if there was any way of at least finding some solace, if not happiness. And eventually great joy came out of it, but that took time. And also, I must mention that I got married too, and the challenge of love was a very important one. In other words, I very soon discovered after I got married for the second time that love is very different than what I thought it was. So I discovered with my wife the meaning of love, and that was a big contribution also to my own spirituality.



WIE: It’s interesting that, while you turned to spirituality because you felt that science wasn’t really satisfying your own search for truth, you have nevertheless remained a scientist throughout.



AG: That’s true. It’s just that my way of doing science changed. What happened to me, the reason that I lost the joy of science, was because I had made it into a professional trip. I lost the ideal way of doing science, which is the spirit of discovery, the curiosity, the spirit of knowing truth. So I was not searching for truth anymore through science, and therefore I had to discover meditation, where I was searching for truth again, truth of reality. What is the nature of reality after all? You see the first tendency was nihilism, nothing exists; I was completely desperate. But meditation very soon told me that no, it’s not that desperate. I had an experience. I had a glimpse that reality really does exist. Whatever it was I didn’t know, but something exists. So that gave me the prerogative to go back to science and see if I could now do science with new energy and new direction and really investigate truth instead of investigating because of professional glory.



WIE: How then did your newly revived interest in truth, this spiritual core to your life, inform your practice of science?



AG: What happened was that I was not doing science anymore for the purpose of just publishing papers and doing problems which enabled you to publish papers and get grants. Instead, I was doing the really important problems. And the really important problems of today are very paradoxical and very anomalous. Well, I’m not saying that traditional scientists don’t have a few important problems. There are a few important problems there too. But one of the problems I discovered very quickly that would lead me, I just intuited, to questions of reality was the quantum measurement problem.



You see, the quantum measurement problem is supposed to be a problem which forever derails people from any professional achievement because it’s a very difficult problem. People have tried it for decades and have not been able to solve it. But I thought, “I have nothing to lose and I am going to investigate only truth, so why not see?” Quantum physics was something I knew very well. I had researched quantum physics all my life, so why not do the quantum measurement problem? So that’s how I came to ask this question, “What agency converts possibility into actuality?” And it still took me from 1975 to 1985 until, through a mystical breakthrough, I came to recognize this.



WIE: Could you describe that breakthrough?



AG: Yes, I’d love to. It’s so vivid in my mind. You see, the wisdom was in those days—and this was in every sort of book, The Tao of Physics, The Dancing Wu Li Masters, Fred Alan Wolf’s Taking the Quantum Leap, and some other books too—everywhere the wisdom was that consciousness must be an emergent phenomenon of the brain. And despite the fact that some of these people, to their credit, were giving consciousness causal efficacy, no one could explain how it happened. That was the mystery because, after all, if it’s an emergent phenomenon of the brain, then all causal efficacy must ultimately come from the material elementary particles. So this was a puzzle to me. This was a puzzle to everybody. And I just couldn’t find any way to solve it. David Bohm talked about hidden variables, so I toyed with his ideas of an explicate order and an implicate order, that kind of thing—but this wasn’t satisfactory because in Bohm’s theory, again, there is no causal efficacy that is given to consciousness. It is all a realist theory. In other words, it is a theory on which everything can be explained through mathematical equations. There is no freedom of choice, in other words, in reality. So I was just struggling and struggling because I was convinced that there is real freedom of choice.



So then one time—and this is where the breakthrough happened—my wife and I were in Ventura, California and a mystic friend, Joel Morwood, came down from Los Angeles, and we all went to hear Krishnamurti. And Krishnamurti, of course, is extremely impressive, a very great mystic. So we heard him and then we came back home. We had dinner and we were talking, and I was giving Joel a spiel about my latest ideas of the quantum theory of consciousness and Joel just challenged me. He said, “Can consciousness be explained?” And I tried to wriggle my way through that but he wouldn’t listen. He said, “You are putting on scientific blinders. You don’t realize that consciousness is the ground of all being.” He didn’t use that particular word, but he said something like, “There is nothing but God.” And something flipped inside of me which I cannot quite explain. This is the ultimate cognition, that I had at that very moment. There was a complete about-turn in my psyche and I just realized that consciousness is the ground of all being. I remember staying up that night, looking at the sky and having a real mystical feeling about what the world is, and the complete conviction that this is the way the world is, this is the way that reality is, and one can do science. You see, the prevalent notion—even among people like David Bohm—was, “How can you ever do science without assuming that there is reality and material and all this? How can you do science if you let consciousness do things which are ‘arbitrary’?” But I became completely convinced—there has not been a shred of doubt ever since—that one can do science on this basis. Not only that, one can solve the problems of today’s science. And that is what is turning out. Of course all the problems did not get solved right on that night. That night was the beginning of a new way of doing science.



WIE: That’s interesting. So that night something really did shift for you in your whole approach. And everything was different after that?



AG: Everything was different.



WIE: Did you then find, in working out the details of what it would mean to do science in this context, that you were able to penetrate much more deeply or that your own scientific thinking was transformed in some way by this experience?



AG: Right. Exactly. What happened was very interesting. I was stuck, as I said, I was stuck with this idea before: “How can consciousness have causal efficacy?” And now that I recognized that consciousness was the ground of being, within months all the problems of quantum measurement theory, the measurement paradoxes, just melted away. I wrote my first paper which was published in 1989, but that was just refinement of the ideas and working out details. The net upshot was that the creativity, which got a second wind on that night in 1985, took about another three years before it started fully expressing itself. But ever since I have been just blessed with ideas after ideas, and lots of problems have been solved—the problem of cognition, perception, biological evolution, mind-body healing. My latest book is called Physics of the Soul. This is a theory of reincarnation, all fully worked out. It has been just a wonderful adventure in creativity.



WIE: So it sounds pretty clear that taking an interest in the spiritual, in your case, had a significant effect on your ability to do science. Looking through the opposite end of the lens, how would you say that being a scientist has affected your spiritual evolution?



AG: Well, I stopped seeing them as separate, so this identification, this wholeness, the integration of the spiritual and the scientific, was very important for me. Mystics often warn people, “Look, don’t divide your life into this and that.” For me it came naturally because I discovered the new way of doing science when I discovered spirit. Spirit was the natural basis of my being, so after that, whatever I do, I don’t separate them very much.



WIE: You mentioned a shift in your motivation for doing science—how what was driving you started to turn at a certain point. That’s one thing that we’ve been thinking about a lot as we’ve been looking into this issue: What is it that really motivates science? And how is that different from what motivates spiritual pursuit? Particularly, there have been some people we have discussed—thinkers like E. F. Schumacher or Huston Smith, for example—who feel that ever since the scientific revolution, when Descartes’s and Newton’s ideas took hold, the whole approach of science has been to try to dominate or control nature or the world. Such critics question whether science could ever be a genuine vehicle for discovering the deepest truths, because they feel that science is rooted in a desire toknow for the wrong reasons. Obviously, in your work you have been very immersed in the scientific world—you know a lot of scientists, you go to conferences, you’re surrounded by all of that and also, perhaps, you struggle with that motivation in yourself. Could you speak a little more about your experience of that?



AG: Yes, this is a very, very good question; we have to understand it very deeply.



The problem is that in this pursuit, this particular pursuit of science, including the books that we mentioned earlier, The Tao of Physics and TheDancing Wu Li Masters, even when spirituality is recognized within the materialist worldview, God is seen only in the immanent aspect of divinity. What that means is: you have said that there is only one reality. By saying that there is only one reality—material reality—even when you imbue matter with spirituality, because you are still dealing with only one level, you are ignoring the transcendent level. And therefore you are only looking at half of the pie; you are ignoring the other half. Ken Wilber makes this point very, very well. So what has to be done of course—and that’s when the stigma of science disappears—is to include the other half into science. Now, before my work, I think it was very obscure how this inclusion has to be done. Although people like Teilhard de Chardin, Aurobindo or Madame Blavatsky, the founder of the Theosophy movement, recognized that such a science could have come, very few could actually see it.



So what I have done is to give actual flesh to all these visions that took place early in the century. And when you do that, when you recognize that science can be based on the primacy of consciousness, then this deficiency isn’t there anymore. In other words then, the stigma that science is only separateness goes away. The materialist science is a separatist science. The new science, though, says that the material part of the world does exist, the separative movement is part of reality also, but it is not the onlypart of reality. There is separation, and then there is integration. So in my book The Self-Aware Universe I talk about the hero’s journey for the entire scientific endeavor. I said that, well, four hundred years ago, with Galileo, Copernicus, Newton and others, we started the separatist sail and we went on a separate journey of separateness, but that’s only the first part of the hero’s journey. Then the hero discovers and the hero returns. It is the hero’s return that we are now witnessing through this new paradigm.

What is Enlightenment Magazine



Saturday, April 20, 2013

The Mystic's Mind




Zen...Satori...Yoga...Aikido...Bushido.  All things which tend to lead the mind to open up to a path which is lit by the stars.  An other worldly ambiance seems to pervade the esoteric disciplines which brought us great social change, through its adherents, which attempted to bring understanding to a world of changes, pain, and despair.  Bringing with them light, joy and peace.   Within that context, the world now shines a bit brighter... And all of humanity benefits as it takes in the moment.

It is easy to dismiss all things mystical as just fantasy and from the land filled with unicorns and gnomes.  A place which only exits in the imagination of a child-like mind.  Yet, it is this trusting innocence which is valued as a way to salvation.  We can only save our lost world through the exercise of those things which bring love and compassion to life.  It is in dying to self that we are born to eternal life.  The world is waiting....  The mystical mind experience beckons us to look and live. 










Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Now And Again...




              THE CELESTIAL GATE MEDITATION by Tom Kenyon



As with other forms of internal alchemy, the Taoist practitioner must train the mind to enter prolonged states of stillness. This quiescence of mind is crucial since the Tao can only be experienced in mental silence, and many of the alchemical transformations of Taoist alchemy also require a silent mind as well.



The Celestial Gate Meditation



The Celestial Gate Meditation practice is based on Dragon Points. Dragon Points, as I mentioned earlier, are places of convergence, where one form of chi meets another.



There are several Dragon Points within the human body. The Celestial Gate is just one of these, and happens to be a place where heavenly chi (a very subtle form of chi) flows into the body and meets the terrestrial (or earth) chi of the body itself. Thus this place is an energetically charged area, and Taoist sages discovered a long time ago how to take advantage of it.



Sit comfortably and close your eyes. You can lie down if you wish, but this makes some people go to sleep. For a moment, just notice your breath. Don’t change it in any way; just watch it. Notice the rhythm and the depth of your breath. Then after a moment, become aware of the space about an inch behind the bridge of the nose. Imagine that there is an opening about one inch square in this area. This is the Celestial Gate. All you do is focus on it.



Do not concentrate on it. Just be aware of it. If you are having thoughts or fantasies, this is not a problem. Let them continue on their merry way. Just let some part of your attention be on the opening. You can think all you want about anything you want and the practice will still work so long as some part of your attention is on the Celestial Gate (the opening).



As you continue to focus at the gate, you will notice that thoughts eventually seem to slow down. After a while, there will be more space between the thoughts or fantasies. And eventually they will stop altogether, if only temporarily. It is during these moments that you might find that your breath has stopped or has become very shallow. This is natural, and is, in fact, a sign that you are entering the deeper states of stillness. It is in these deepest states of quiescence where there is no breath and no thought that contact with the Tao takes place.



Doing it for about five minutes will usually give you a clear sense of how this practice alters awareness. Beginners usually take several minutes to settle down into the light stages of mental stillness. But over time these periods get longer and one feels more confident about how to enter these deeply relaxing states of mind.



Research has shown that stillness practices, such as this, are very effective at counteracting some of the negative effects of stress. Just twenty minutes once or twice a day can make a tremendous difference in your sense of wellbeing.



Don’t let the simplicity of this meditation fool you. It is a profound stillness practice that will eventually lead you to a direct experience of the Tao itself. Gently extend the periods of stillness, so that you become acquainted with and comfortable with these deep places of quiet.



In Taoism, the deepest secrets are revealed only by the Tao itself. You cannot find the deeper alchemical truths in books for it is forbidden to write about them. Thus, meditations like the Celestial Gate are cosmic keys. They can, if practiced faithfully over time, open the inner doors of perception.



But you must turn the key to open the lock. Just thinking about it won’t create transformation. If you wish to experience the mysteries of the Tao for yourself, don’t just read about them. Turn the key and walk through the door.



© 2012 Tom Kenyon. All rights reserved. http://tomekenyon.com



You may make copies of this message and distribute it in any media as long as you change nothing, do not charge for it, credit the author, and include this complete copyright notice and web address.

Monday, February 4, 2013

No Words...




There are no words to describe an emotional experience this deep - this profound.  A million ideas form into questions...  How? When?  What if?,,,  Like an unsung melody we stare.  Hoping for what?...We never are quite sure.  Night turns into day.  Reality is all awash in some sentimental feeling we ride like a wave of ocean myst that hurdles us along to our ill-forgotten fate beneath a wind-swept  salty wave.  Pounded again and again on the sandy floor of shattered hopes and dreams... And still we stare!  Our eyes take in the beauty.  The radiance of such lovliness.  Our heart skips a beat!  Thoughts are just a pile of nothingness on our threshing floor of blood, sweat and tears.  But a faint whisp of sweet perfume makes it way to our senses - snapping us awake from our dreams and fantasies.  Reality
can be a sweet and splendid thing. If only for a momnet...                                                                                                                                     

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Monday, January 28, 2013

The Science Of Meditation...





Neuro Meditation


The New Way of the West View Brainmaps of Meditators


Neuro Mediation combines traditional meditation techniques with modern technology. With the use of brainwave training equipment as well as other biofeedback modalities individuals can learn to meditate more quickly and easily than in the past.



These modern techniques grew out of decades of scientific research and the clinical use of EEG biofeedback (also know as neurofeedback or brainwave training) to train deep states. More recently groundbreaking research through brainmapping, such as Richard Davidson's work at Keck Labs, University of Wisconsin, has added valuable information that is guiding efforts internationally to better understand and implement these new technologies.



The staff at New Mind Centers has been studying both traditional and modern technologies regarding meditation and other altered states for decades and teaching hundreds how to use these technologies together for transformation and transcendance. We believe that the way westerners will fully come to embrace meditation is through the use of modern technology.



Come join our workshops and lets us teach you how to meditate the new modern way using scientificly based methods and equipment. The New Way of the West is dawning.

Training Meditational States With Neurofeedback In A Clinical Setting

By Richard Soutar, Ph.D.

The definition of meditation is problematic in that various authors in the west may employ the term based on either its western or eastern meaning without making a clear distinction regarding their definition of the term. The meaning of the term used in this chapter will be derived from the eastern concept of the term as it has manifested in western experience. There have been arguments in the past that we in the west do not understand the writings of the east and misinterpret meanings and definitions of terms related to meditation. I believe that enough westerners have studied and meditated under eastern masters at this point, over a century, to have clarified the basic terms as they relate to tacit experience. In addition to this experience, a considerable amount of scientific data has been acquired on both eastern and western meditators to provide an objective framework for a fine analysis of the reported tacit experiences of both cultural paradigms.

Meditation is usually associated with a religious tradition of some kind, although there have been arguments regarding whether Zen is technically a religion (Austin, 1998). It is interesting to note the pattern of development of Buddhist meditation techniques and styles as it has moved through various cultures over time. Although the symbols and terms often change, the technique remains essentially the same. In fact a close analysis of Hindu meditation techniques, which predate Buddhism, reveal profound similarities as well. Many authors who have surveyed the variety of religious techniques called meditation, such as Daniel Goleman (1988), have found they all have a great deal in common. Herbert Benson (2000) employed physiological measures to observe meditative techniques of a variety of religions and found a common physiological pattern as well as a common technique.

The most highly refined ancient system of meditation we have records of emerged first in the Hindu tradition (Mascaro,1965). These techniques were well established prior to the advent of Buddhism or Christianity. The culmination of this tradition was consolidated in the Yogic Aphorisms of Patanjali in the first century (AD). The Buddha, Siddartha Gautama, had studied these techniques in depth, found them unsatisfactory, and refined them in a manner leading to his enlightenment in the form of a special state of consciousness he named Nirvana (Rahula, 1959). The Buddhists developed several documents or scriptures around the theory and practice of meditation and these ideas migrated into most of the Asian cultures, each of which added its own symbols and refinements. It may have found its purest form in the Japanese form of Buddhism known as Zen. This religion, if we can call it that, eschews all written scripture and focuses entirely on techniques supported by oral tradition. This is fairly common in earlier civilizations, but upon close inspection it will be found that most of the Hindu and Buddhist meditational traditions also rely heavily on oral tradition and direct transmission and actually leave the details out of their written documents. This practice appears to be due more to the fact that it is almost impossible to teach meditation through written instruction then to any secrecy issues or lack of literacy.

Herbert Benson ( 2000) may be our modern western version of Bodhidharma in that he has scientifically studied these techniques, stripped them of their cultural trappings, and provided scientific measures to explain the mechanisms behind them and clearly and simply operationalize his findings. In a similar manner Banquet (1973) also has studied in depth the modern Hindu version of meditation as it has migrated west in the form of the Marharishi Mahesh Yogi’s Transcendental Meditation, or TM as it has become known. When compared, these various Hindu and Buddhist techniques, as they have filtered into the west, are at root almost identical. It is clear, however, from the extensive translations on meditation, that these techniques are in many cases only the fundamentals. There are clearly many more techniques, some claiming to be advanced methods for achieving states of awareness for which we have no comparable categories or words in the west (Goleman, 1988; Austin, 1998).

The goal of meditation has been defined differently for the various traditions it is embedded in. The Hindu perspective presents meditation as one of the key methods for achieving transcendence of the human experience and union with the fundamental source of the universe (Noss, 1968; Mascaro, 1965). The Buddhist goal is more in accord with modern psychology in that it seeks to reduce suffering and dissatisfaction. This goal is arrived at not by achieving a normal state, but a supernormal state called Nirvana. This is because Buddhists are not just interested in reducing suffering, but in the cessation of all suffering. To do this requires a fundamental experience and insight into the nature of existence (Rahula, 1959; Kamalashila, 1995, Dali Lama, 2001). Psychologists are not so ambitious in this area. The key issues in the Diagnostic Manual are level of suffering, statistical rarity of behavior, and interference of the behavior with daily life (DSM IV). Psychologists are interested in integrating individuals back into the social mainstream, whereas the Buddhists are unconcerned with this dimension of remediation. Never-the-less, the mutual goal of understanding mind and the reduction of suffering suggests some value may be mutually discovered between approaches. This has been clear to hundreds of researchers and specialists in these areas. More recently toward this end, Richard Davison at Keck Laboratory for Functional Brain Imaging and Behavior at the University of Wisconsin has been investigating various states achieved by Tibetan practitioners of meditation with considerable success.

The movement of western science into the domain of meditation holds great promise. Physiological states that confer considerable mental and physical benefits on practitioners have been identified. The possibility of identifying specific states and their EEG correlates holds the potential promise of being able to train these states more clearly and effectively utilizing modern technology.

The Features of Meditative States

Two of the best models of the progression of meditative states are the Buddhist and the Hindu (Goleman, 1988). In the Buddhist tradition there is a particular emphasis on extending the meditative experience into everyday life and this is achieved through a technique known as Mindfulness. It was this feature of Buddhist practice that offset it in particular from the Hindu approach. Siddartha reportedly found that the achievement of the states his Hindu practice culminated in were wanting in that the individual found himself right back where he started once the particular state was exited (Goleman,1988).

The Hindu model is best demonstrated in the Aphorisms of Patanjali (Isherwood & Prabhavananda, 1969) (sources date it somewhere between 4 th century B.C. and 4 th century A.D.). These are a codification of techniques and theory regarding the achievement of various states of consciousness leading up to the ultimate form of Samadhi in which one experiences an ultimate state of being. The Aphorisms begin with discussions regarding physical health practices and moral conduct which this tradition finds essential to the achievement of a stability in the physical world that is conducive to the practice of exercises and techniques leading to these altered states of consciousness. Once this daily continuity is established the goal is to practice and gain control over the five basic kinds of thought waves. This is done in stages starting with concentration and progressing through Samayama, Savitarka Samadhi, Nirvichara Samadhi and finally Nirvikalpa Samadhi.

The Visuddhimagga according to Goleman (1988) is "the traditional recipe book for meditation" in the Buddhist tradition. Although Buddha lived in the 6 th century B.C., it was oral tradition which sustained his teachings until they were first committed to writing in the 1 st century B.C (Rahula, 1959). The Visuddhimagga is part of this written "Pali" tradition and describes the techniques and details relating to Buddhist meditational technology. In this text the principles and practices are described in fine detail. Never-the-less, the assistance of a guide who has first hand experience navigating this journey is recognized as essential among Buddhists.

Buddhist approaches revolve around a dual approach of utilizing both concentration techniques and insight techniques (Rahula, 1959; Goleman, 1988; Kamalashila, 1995; Dali Lama, 2001). The concentration techniques are very similar to and probably derived from ancient yogic techniques as eventually defined in the work of Patanjali. The stages in these techniques are referred to as "jhanas."There are eight levels of jhanas after access state. Access state is similar to the achievement of dhyana in Patanjali’s approach.

The path of insight in Buddhist tradition is meant to take concentration and focus it on the dilemmas of outward everyday experience. Mindfulness is the first step in which the practitioner applies concentration to perceptual experience. In mindfulness the practitioner develops self-awareness to a point where he is constantly aware of all thoughts and feelings from moment to moment. With the guidance of traditional Buddhist wisdom he is able to gain insight into the dilemma of suffering and human existence. These insights occur in categories comprising rough stages of development extending through Reflection, Pseudonirvana, Realization, Effortless Insight, Nirvana, and finally Nirodh.

In both traditions, understanding that attachment to sense objects and thought objects is a major impediment to Liberation and that disengaging from these attachments is the key to full Enlightenment (Rahula, 1959). This requires conscious and intentional confirmation through direct experience of the lack of fulfillment that results from pursuit of these attachments. Discussion regarding attachment, karma, bondage, and liberation is useful, but primarily inspirational in function. One may commit to memory and master the meaning of the sutras, but remain deluded and ignorant from this perspective. It is through direct tacit experience of the fruitlessness of pursuing a path of thought or worldly action to obtain some type of salvation that an individual begins to experience the truth of the matter. This tacit truth leads to a new understanding or insight regarding the nature of being in this dimension. This approach leads intuitively to concentration and mindfulness. As it turns out, these are distinct categories of psychophysiological states with specific neurophysiological and electrophysiological markers (DeLuca & Daley, 2003; Banquet, 1973; Dunn et al, 1999; Goleman, 2003; Benson, 2000).

Herbert Benson (1975) was among the first, and certainly the most aggressive, researchers to investigate the phenomena of meditation in a consistent transcultural manner utilizing a scientific approach and modern instruments of measurement. The field of psychophysiology owes a huge debt to him and the risks he took with regard to his career as a Harvard academician. What Benson discovered as he measured the EEG and took peripheral measures of autonomic function, was that there was a common signature to these various diverse religious approaches to meditation and prayer. He referred to it as a hypometabolic state. The unusual ability of humans to achieve this state with clear psychophysiological markers had profound implications for physical and mental health. As an M.D., Benson immediately recognized the potential significance of this discovery for society. Benson extracted the basic techniques required for achieving this state from their religious and cultural trappings and presented it to the west as a solution to psycho physiological disorders, which the AMA by its own reckoning had determined were responsible for 60-70% of all doctor visits.

What Benson apparently had not fully realized was that he had only scratched the surface and had presented a means to achieving "access" state. This, however, was still a tremendous achievement. Unfortunately the social order latched onto it as another brief fad reported in the media, although his books still sell well. As those of us in the field of psychophysiology know full well, anything that takes practice will always fall short when in competition with the drugs that are the quick path of salvation in our modern society; even if that salvation is only temporary.

In summary, it is clear that there is a common underlying group of techniques that lead to specific psychophysiological states that are not necessarily fully contingent upon a religious and cultural perspective in order to be achieved. The techniques are easy to practice and the psychophsiological consequences are clearly observable and measurable. The benefits, in terms of both physical and psychological consequences, are also easily observable and measurable. Meditation has been more researched than many realize. T.M., the group Benson had originally studied and out of which his Relaxation Response techniques were developed, has been the subject of over 400 scientific studies from international sources. All of these studies conclude that the mental, physical, and psychological changes that occur in people from in engaging in this process are profound. Research grants for this area have been surprisingly lacking, but given our cultural bias for quick and easy solutions to our problems this should not be that surprising. In the next section we will explore what the researchers have found regarding the measures associated with these states and the benefits uncovered by research to date.

Research On Meditation

Although the more advanced meditative states may still be beyond the measurement capabilities of our present technology, past research has made it clear that we are capable of measuring these states very well up to the point of access state or samadhi (Austin, 1998). The achievement of these basic meditative states is significant enough in their ramifications for mental and physical health as to make them worthy of measuring and operationalizing. In fact Benson (2000) found that just entering a basic hypometabolic state on a daily basis had profound effects on mental and physical health. So let us review the basic markers or features of these hypometabolic or meditative states and discern what to look for in those clients we might want to introduce to this technology as we train them to enter these states. This will help determine the methods that can be employed to teach clients these states.

There has been much discussion over the ages in Hindu and Buddhist tradition regarding the importance of correct posture and breathing to achieve deep meditative states. Some of the requirements and claims are exotic and based in superstitions. In reviewing the literature James Austin (1998) finds that assuming a lotus position verses sitting in a chair does not make a difference with regard to achieving the states we can measure. He further notes that focusing the attention on a repetitive stimulus facilitates the production of alpha. So sitting quietly in a chair and focusing the attention on the same stimulus over and over will generate higher levels of alpha than engaging in other activities. Benson confirmed this and indicated that sitting quietly in a chair and counting breaths, like Zen monks did, was fundamental to achieving the relaxation response.

Austin (1998 ), reviewing the research on meditation and breathing, also notes that breathing rate slows from the norm of 12-18 breaths per minute to 4-6 breaths per minute. There is a lengthening of the exhalation period and the inhalation period drops from 43% to 25% of the breathing cycle. An important part of the exhalation extension is an increase in the pause between exhalation and the next inhalation. During this period the breath may become briefly suspended. In some cases for several minutes in advanced meditators. This is interesting as Austin notes that breathing out quiets the activity of brain cells while breathing in increases activity. This suggests a form of neural silence is being cultivated (Adam Crane and I discussed this in our book Mindfitness). There is an overall reduction in oxygen consumption which is different from sleep. Consumption drops 8% after several hours of sleep but 10-20% after the first three minutes in meditation.

Wallace (1970) was the first to comprehensively investigate and report the physiological aspect of meditation. He noted a decreased oxygen consumption as well as a decreased carbon dioxide elimination process. He reported decreased respiration rate, decreased heart rate, increased basal skin resistance, increased intensity of alpha activity in the frontal and central regions, episodes of rhythmical EEG theta activity in the frontal region and decreased arterial lactate levels. Benson (1975) observed overall reduced autonomic arousal as well and stressed the significance of a reduction in blood lactate as it is considered an index of overall autonomic distress. This later measure is important because it is highly correlated with anxiety when it is high. Benson (2000) and Cade (1989) both reported reduced SCR, a measure of galvanic skin response and reduced EMG, a measure of somatic tone or muscle tension. These measures are also greater in higher states of arousal and anxiety. Green (1970) noted increased peripheral vascularity, also a measure of relaxation. Austin (1998 ) reports serotonin increases.

Changes in EEG are also striking. Kasamatsu & Hirai, (1966), who measured the EEG of a group of Zen monks with a variety of meditative experience in terms of years meditating, found the first important change was a dramatic increase in alpha amplitude 60-70uv (this is with eyes open). This alpha is highly synchronous. Over the course of the meditation period this alpha increased in amplitude and slowed in frequency. Initially this alpha was dominant in the posterior regions but became progressively more prominent in the anterior region as the meditation continued. In advanced meditators the alpha reached very high amplitudes and actually slowed into the theta frequencies (6-7hz). Then rhythmical trains of theta come and go. In comparing these patterns to controls who are drifting into sleep or in a hypnotic trance, the pattern was found to be uniquely different. The authors divided the phenomena of meditation into four categories reflecting deeper levels of attainment.

Studies of eyes closed TM meditators uncovered another interesting EEG component of meditation. Banquet (1973) found similar patterns to the Japanese study with increased alpha amplitudes and slowing followed by rhythmic trains of theta. These patterns are highly synchronized across the scalp. Rather than coherence dropping as occurs in sleep, coherence increases, especially in the frontal region. Banquet also notes the theta is very regular, not the usual irregular theta of drowsiness. What is of interest in Banquets study is that during the third stage of meditation (Banquet also identified four levels) smooth 20hz beta spindles begin to appear. These are distinctly different from the spindling that occurs prior to sleep. This had been identified in other studies in adepts prior to their entrance in to samadhi. The beta shifts to continuous 30 and 60hz sinusoidal waves rippling over the rhythmic theta. This beta pattern emerges from the left anterior region.

Symmetry and coherence are also important measures of EEG that reflect changes in the brain with respect to time series analysis. Both Westcott (1973) and later Cade (1989) reported from England that individuals engaged in meditative states demonstrated balanced levels of power across the spectrum with respect to both hemispheres. The progressive increases in coherence as meditation progresses that was noted by Banquet and others are synchronized with the breath suspension periods characteristic of deeper theta stages (Badawi et al., 1984). Recently phase was also investigated by Herbert et al (2003). They reported enhanced long-range EEG alpha phase synchronization during meditation. This indicates that not only is coherence high, but that there is zero phase angle between sites and confirming that global phase synchronization is a unique feature of this state. Furthermore, this same level of synchronization was not noted in other frequency bands.

Another study done by Dunn et al (1999) indicates that there is a distinct difference between the EEG of individuals who are relaxing versus individuals who are meditating. This study indicated that the key difference was high levels of alpha activity focused around the parietal region at Pz. Individuals in a relaxed sate had no such EEG pattern. Some as yet unpublished research done by Richard Davidson and reported by Daniel Goleman (2003) done at Keck Labs at the University of Wisconsin also indicates meditative states have unique signatures. An advanced Tibetan Buddhist meditator approved by the Dali Lama as representative of the Tibetan tradition was recorded performing three different types of meditation using (f)MRI and qEEG. Results indicated that measurements indicated that each technique resulted in a unique state that had a distinct metabolic and qEEG signature. Another recent study supportive of this was a qEEG and LORETA analysis of another Tibetan monk which indicated that three types of meditative techniques similar to the ones reviewed at Keck also had distinct signatures (DeLuca & Daly, 2003).

Finally, Newberg and D’Aquili (2001) reported SPECT scan analysis of an advanced meditator showing significant hypofusion of the parietal region around Pz during advanced meditative states as well. All of these recent investigations indicate that meditative states are clearly distinct from relaxation and distinct states in their own right. In addition, these studies determined that concentrative meditation shows a unique EEG and blood perfusion pattern at PZ in particular. This area, according to Newberg is the orientation association area that has the key function of discriminating self form other. Both the EEG and hypofusion measures indicate that this area is highly underactivated in meditation and may in part explain the profound sense of oneness that is common to this experience.

The benefits of meditation are diverse and fairly well established at this point. Much of the research comes from a great variety of studies (Benson, 2000 ). Meditation reduces state and trait anxiety, enhances serotonin levels, reduces blood lactate levels, hypertension, insomnia, improves cognitive performance, enhances memory, results in reductions in moodiness, and diminished cravings for food as well as other mediums of the addictive process. With regard to the last item, it should be noted in passing that Penniston derived his alpha-theta protocol for dealing with addictive disorders from workshops presented by Elmer Green (Kulkosky, 1996). Green utilized theta training at O1 as a protocol because he learned from laboratory experiments that high theta at this location was a unique signature of a meditational techniques he had learned in graduate school (Green, 1993). In other words, we are already using this technology in neurofeedback without openly acknowledging its source.



Cognitive Changes and Therapeutic Applications

The work of Aaron Beck and Martin Seligman is widely appreciated in psychology today and can be found in every psychology 101 textbook in publication. Yet it is amazing how poorly this research appears to be applied until very recently. As it turns out, meditation is an excellent vehicle for application of these principles. In addition, neurofeedback can effectively combine both of these paradigms in a manner that makes them easier to operationalize in a clinical setting. In fact, many forms of neurofeedback can be interpreted as a form of meditational training, especially alpha-theta training. As was pointed out above, alpha-theta training was indirectly derived from meditational training. The details of this dimension of application of neurofeedback can only be briefly summarized and superficially covered within this chapter but they will be further explicated in a forthcoming book.

Martin Seligman’s (1975) research uncovered the fact that mammals begin to destabilize physiologically when exposed to double-bind situations. They begin to behave like depressed human beings and frequently die if not removed from the double-bind. Aaron Beck (1979) took this insight one step further and applied it to the cognitive realm. Neo-behaviorism and the cognitive revolution soon followed in psychology. Beck found that humans responded to cognitive double-binds as well as situational ones with depression and a unique pattern of "automatic thinking." Presently Beck finds these patterns of thinking in individuals with anxiety as well. What is of even greater interest is that recent research suggests that depression may be an end stage to chronic anxiety (Davidson, 2000). The implications of this is that individuals respond to double-bind situations, both physical and cognitive, with growing anxiety. This anxiety over time often triggers a protective response in the organism that comes in the form of depression (Zacharo, 1991). There is considerable clinical and research to support this perspective (Beck, 1979; Davidson, 2000; Davidson et al, 2000; Kaplan, 2002). It has been suggested that this trigger is a consequence of the exhaustion of the central nervous system. I can recall John Gilbert having worked with 114 cases of depression and reporting at the SNR meeting (2000) that the lifting of the depression in all cases resulted in the manifestation of either severe anger or fear (anxiety). In almost every clinical case we have had over the past eight years we have seen anxiety emerge as depression lifts both in terms of symptoms and in the qEEG analysis. There is insufficient room in this chapter to explicate the details, however in short we usually see a shift from excessive slowing in the left hemisphere to increased activation in the right as well as a drop in slow wave amplitude as the Beck inventories indicate a reduction in severity of symptoms. This can manifest in many patterns in the qEEG and is easily missed unless one is looking for it. Based on the research of Davidson et al (1999) and others, this is exactly what we should expect to see.

Recently the work of Jeffrey Schwartz (2002) has indicated that worry associated with OCD can be reduced or eliminated using techniques drawn from Buddhist meditation. The key feature is disengagement from discursive thinking involving fearful thoughts. It is well known that individuals with OCD engage obsessively in specific categories of disturbing thoughts. These too are automatic thoughts, but an extreme form. Schwartz has even identified the "worry circuit," an anterior cingulate network interfacing the orbital frontal region with the amygdala, in the brain that is responsible for this loss of control over thought. It is interesting to note that Demasio (1999) reported that automatic thoughts can operate extensively below the threshold of awareness. In fact a great deal of the thought process occurs below the threshold of awareness. This makes sense from what we know of the pattern of learning in humans. We tend to routinize any learned sequence and perform the routines with a minimal conscious effort (Posner & Raichle, 1994). Repetitive patterns of thought consequently become background neural activity.

When alpha training individuals, it is common to see them desynchronize into beta and report initially that they did not know what they were thinking. This is because discursive thought often involves a loss of self-awareness. In fact it is this loss of awareness that meditation seeks to resolve. With further practice individuals begin to become aware of these thoughts. They are in fact automatic thoughts that fall into the categories described by Beck. They are triggering amygdalic responses in the limbic system that result in chronic autonomic arousal. This is because the amygdala cannot distinguish external threat stimuli from internal threat stimuli (Le Doux, 1996).

According to LeDoux the frontal cortex’s primary response to the amygdala’s stimulation is increased activity ie dsynchronization and increased beta due to higher levels of arousal and processing. Of course the hallmark of individuals with anxiety is elevated beta. In fact, over activation of the left frontal region has been associated with worry, the right frontal region with high arousal and panic (Nitscke al, 1997), and the right parietal with rumination (Davidson,1999). Le Doux observes that the left dorsolateral frontal increases in activity are likely related to short term memory networks over-engaged in the worry process. He notes this may be one way of gating the short term memory area so that the driving conditioned fear stimuli in the parahippocampal regions cannot enter conscious awareness and generate panic states. Sterman (1995) demonstrates how this pattern of desychronization without sufficient resynchronization between tasks can tire individuals and reduce performance levels. Memory and problem solving skills degrade resulting in less effective interactions with the environment. Over time this results in reduced social accuracy and reduced access to social resources as well as increased avoidance behavior

The consequence of excessive and chronic over arousal and worry also increases in cortisol levels in the bloodstream that damage the hippocampus (McEwen, 1987; Kaplan, 2002). Not only does this result in loss of short term memory function but also depresses immune function as the hippocampus is a key switching mechanism for global immune system function. Research in the past has established significant reductions in immunoglobulin A (Stone et al, 1987; Cohen & Herbert, 1996), the first line of immune defense, in the face of even moderate distress. More recently the work of Davidson et al (2003) continues to support these findings. Fortunately, withdrawal from stressful stimuli also results in neurogenesis in the hippocampus and a return of memory and immune function. This observation is also supportive of the notion that the body may have intrinsic mechanisms to reduce exposure to excessive negative stimulation and avoidant behavior due to left frontal slowing and depression may be a primary mechanism for this protective process.

Given the above considerations it makes sense that engaging in an exercise that reduces activity in the worry circuit and calms the central nervous system would be as effective as any medication if the individual had learned control of their CNS through this exercise. The primary technique in meditation is the continuous observation of a stimulus without digression into discursive thinking. This results in growing synchronous alpha amplitudes across cortical networks. If this activity is practiced long enough, a growing neural silence begins to emerge which Adam Crane (2000) appropriately refers to as profound attention. The brain becomes increasingly hypercoupled and begins to drift into sleep. However, with efforts to maintain significant levels of arousal, for instance by maintaining an erect posture, sleep spindles fail to emerge and alpha power increases. The individual maintains awareness at increasingly lower levels of arousal.

Demasio (2002) has hypothesized that consciousness emerges in layers, like an onion skin, as arousal (the RAS networks) energizes layers of brain networks from the brain stem upward. He believes that the most primitive levels of awareness begin in the trigeminal plane. This is just above the brain stem. It is likely that generators in these regions operate in the delta frequencies. John (1999) found that consciousness seemed to emerge around 3-4hz in individuals waking from anesthesia. It may be that maintaining enough arousal to experience these more primitive levels of consciousness could result in novel experiences of more basic forms of awareness covered up by a more normally active cortex. Consciousness at this level may interact with the implicate order in a different way than we are used to experiencing. This primitive experience of awareness may be more unitive in nature. To be able to consciously access it may indicate a new level of organism self-regulation that involves greater top down integration.

Clinical Implementation

Regardless of the true mechanisms and metaphysical implications of the meditative process the 40 years of research has clearly established its validity as a unique state of hypometabolic functioning distinct from sleep or hypnotic trance and having a unique set of associated states with unique EEG signatures. This suggests that neurofeedback should be an effective way of training these states and verifying their attainment. In fact several people have been doing this for over a decade including Adam Crane, Les Femi, myself, Anna Wise, and Maxwell Cade to name a few. I have used EEG Biofeedback to train individuals with mental disorders to meditate for over half a decade utilizing the research mentioned in this chapter and with excellent results. I would argue that those who use alpha-theta training have been doing it as well. I have found that this type of training is especially effective with individuals with anxiety, depression, headaches, and fibromyalgia. In fact it is often more effective than neurofeedback alone.

In my extensive dealings with individuals with anxiety disorders I have found that the most difficult cases could train their alpha up to some degree but their beta went up as well and they could not train their beta down. This lack of plasticity I interpreted as a consequence of a long standing neural habit grounded in a physiological pattern resulting in a structural change. Such patterns have emerged in other research (Schwartz, 2002). This neural neohomeostasis requires time and the exercise of new inhibitory patterns to alter. LeDoux (1996 ) notes that fear response do not extinguish because the responses are lost, but rather because new inhibitory networks develop to control them. In spite of extensive practice, many severely anxious clients develop this ability to inhibit beta very slowly. I have found that teaching them the relaxation response techniques while monitoring them allows me to better direct the instruction and outcome. In most cases clients are able to reduce their beta and increase their alpha more effectively with neuromonitoring of their EEG during Relaxation Response training than through EEG biofeedback alone. In fact, the two techniques appear to be synergistic.

As a consequence of this I asked Dave Siever at Mind Alive to build me an inexpensive hand held analogue alpha trainer for clients to take home with them. Interestingly enough, Richard Glade found out about the device and began successfully using it to help train novices in Tibetan Meditation techniques. Since that time interest has been growing.

Anna Wise has developed extensively the technique of neuromonitoring. Using Cade’s mind mirror, Anna conducts group workshops where everyone is hooked up to the mind mirror and she switches from participant to participant as she takes them through exercises meant to generate specific component bands of frequencies. In this process she helps teach them how to access different levels of consciousness and shape their brainwave patterns into an awakened mind state similar to the one Cade (1997) found in his research. Anna is able to harness group dynamics to help individuals past barriers to growth they might not normally be able to overcome as quickly working on their own. This is somewhat reflected in Buddhist tradition where meditators frequently practice in groups because it is felt that the resulting atmosphere aids the meditation process.

Clients can be trained to meditate using both neurofeedback and more traditional techniques and reap tremendous benefits from the process. The two approaches appear to be synergistic and often work better together, especially for westerners who appear to need external aids to assist them in understanding the process and how it impacts them. Finally, this approach can be harnessed for group work in a very powerful way that helps individuals overcome difficult blocks to growth as well as give therapists a means of monitoring how effective their group process is from moment to moment.

Clinical Implementation

Assessing clients to determine if they are appropriate for this approach is a crucial first step in employment of this technology. There are many cultural and superstitious barriers to using these technologies in a therapeutic setting. Many individuals from various conservative religious backgrounds define meditation as distinct from prayer and as either suspect or dangerous to engage in. They may have the same perspective on brainwave training. Usually it is not worth the effort to attempt to engage them in either approach. On the other end of the spectrum are individuals who assume either approach is silly and pointless. They consider themselves very practical people who stay close to the facts and "know better" than to waste their time on such an intangible process. This latter category often include many "hard nosed" professionals who are quick with opinions and slow to read the research. We have found it equally a waste of time to attempt to gain their interest. The type of client most suitable, unfortunately, are intelligent, educated and open minded people who are generally open to novel approaches to problem solving in most areas of their lives. It is extremely helpful if they have any prior exposure to yoga, the experience of meditation, or altered states. Even if their disorder is extreme and long standing we find they respond to these technologies very well.

Initially we have them undergo a qEEG in order to examine the distribution of their EEG and determine if neurofeedback alone or NFB guided meditation is a better approach. We avoid using the latter approach on individuals with indications of TBI, ADD, or similar disorders involving excessive slow wave activity. Pure unipolar depressives are rare, but they would constitute another category to avoid. Since most individuals with depression also have active or latent anxiety disorders underlying the depression process, they are acceptable candidates.

During the first session we establish baseline measures of EEG amplitude in the various frequency bands we plan to work with based on their brain map. We also select the initial site of training. Often we train along the midline somewhere to avoid asymmetry issues and allow the brain to make its own decisions during the training process in matters of coherence and symmetry. Since the research suggests that access state involves an equal distribution between hemispheres of component bands across the frequency spectrum, the midline is a good selection. Much of the research suggests Pz as an important site and consequently we will begin there unless there are contraindications. This is also the sight where Bill Scott does most of his alpha-theta training. Another reason is that the research suggests that the initially emerging global EEG patterns first appear in the posterior region at each stage and move forward to the anterior region.

We begin training individuals with a 9-11hz band of alpha and attempt to get the clients to exceed their baseline readings with respect to magnitude. We train them to breath from their diaphragms and monitor their breathing. As they become acclimated to this over several sessions we begin teaching them to increase the duration of their exhalation phase and particularly to focus on the space between in breath and out breath. However, this an initial phase in the training process and we do not really heavily emphasize the breathing until the neuromonitoring phases.

We initially use proportional feedback as Kamiya’s research (1969) indicates it is most effective for training alpha. Once they have achieved sufficient amplitude of alpha, we may switch over to dichotomous feedback and a broader band of 8-12hz. We train in ten minute intervals initially, based on Kamiya’s findings (1969) and the general learning literature which suggests most people have difficulty sustaining focus after seven minutes. Over time we extend that period to twenty minutes as the client demonstrates extended capacity to focus. During this period there is usually much discussion on the nature of discursive thought and the many topics on their mind that lead them into it and away from focusing on the training. We also point out constantly during their training how their alpha amplitude falls when they engage in discursive thought.

Once the client is able to exceed baseline, we focus progressively on posture, muscle tone EMG, and SCR as necessary, as well as heart rate. This often assists them in achieving higher amplitudes of alpha. The client is able to see from the training graphs the impact these other domains of practice have on their overall performance and are often inspired to practice them more in their daily routine.

Eventually we begin five minute trials with the feedback turned off. This is the neuromonitoring phase. During this period we review and emphasize the relaxation response techniques developed by Benson. As they demonstrate a greater capacity to increase alpha and reduce beta we focus progressively more on their breathing pattern, getting them to focus on the space between their breathing. We next expand to ten minute trials and begin them on training at home once a day for ten minutes.

During the neuromonitoring phase it is possible to sculpt the EEG patterns using techniques developed by Anna Wise or add visualizations practiced in Tibetan Buddhist traditions. Knowing the clients history is useful here. A practitioner can implement healing visualizations for those with somatic problems, compassionate visualizations for those with anger issues, etc. Many of the Tibetan techniques use the period toward the end of the meditation to implement these visualizations as it is a period of peak concentration. Recently in France, in a research projected directed by Benson, they have begun exploring the extraordinary amount of physical heat that meditators are able to generate using this technique. Tibetan meditators can dry out wet sheets of fabric placed on their bare backs while sitting outdoors in freezing temperatures. Clearly this would indicate it is an effective point in the meditation to focus on other visualization.

During the neuromonitoring period clients tend to experience successive insights into their own attachments or life agendas. One client from our clinic was suffering from panic attacks and realized that she was always trying to make things come out perfect. Once this insight emerged her training abruptly improved and she discontinued having panic attacks. As clients progress they may have more and more subtle insights. As they become more self-aware, they recognize they are entertaining particular automatic thoughts without realizing it. These thoughts are often key to uncovering their personal agendas. These agendas are often grounded in childhood conclusions regarding fundamental issues of life which have never been reviewed with adult awareness (Cozolino,2002). Once they come into awareness they can be uncovered in many compartments of everyday life and inhibited. This reintegration process takes continued mindfulness throughout the day. In this way the individuals life is progressively transformed. As they learn this techniques they can begin to do it on their own without clinical support. The stuff of everyday life becomes a vehicle for ongoing insight.

The release of energy bound up in cortical processing involving worry, rumination, and hyperarousal is considerable. Clients begin to feel physically more energetic, lighter and stronger. Health improves as previously suppressed immune functions come back on line. Memory begins to return as neurogenisis occurs in the hippocampus region. Clients sleep better as circadian cycles normalize. They begin to report that they are less reactive to stimuli that they usually consider dangerous or negative in some manner.

It has been recently commented upon in the field of psychology (Elkins,1999) that clinicians often find clients becoming more spiritual in orientation as they come to the end of their therapy sessions. At this point many therapists direct their clients to other experts in faith. For those neurotherapists who have the inclination and resources this is an opportunity to harness the latest scientific insights into the neuropsychological of behavior and consciousness to work with the client who wishes and explore beyond the average level of integrative functioning. The clients that come to our office specifically for meditative training will often be engaged to pursue this "Process" deeper with us as clinicians. During this period we begin to explore more fundamental issues of suffering and attachment. These may include closer examination of the thoughts that still intrude during meditation, the finer points of managing destructive emotions, fundamental issues of attachment surrounding pleasure, fear, and death. Once they become skilled at this process they will go on to continue it naturally and seek out others also engaged in the process to share their insights with. Ultimately this leads to integration with a loose community of friends dedicated to higher goals relating to the most fundamental insights regarding life and the human condition.

In Conclusion

Adam Crane and I met because we had read much of the same literature and through our life experiences came to the same conclusions regarding meditation, EEG biofeedback, and higher state of consciousness. We wrote our book "Mindfitness" to express our view point. One of the most important segments is on the Newtonian causal bias, often referred to as scientific materialism, that still pervades science even though it has been established as erroneous (Soutar, 1996). Stanislove Grof (1993) devotes a good portion of his book "The Holotropic Mind" brilliantly to the same issue. This erroneous perspective limit’s the questions we ask in research and impedes science. Science is the search for scientific truth and holds all scientific truth to be temporary. Unfortunately many scientists never learned the difference between scientific truth and absolute truth in their college methods class. They believe scientific truth is able to replace absolute truth. There is little support for that conclusion. According to all of the most recent thinking in the field of the epistemology of science, we can only conclude that a hypothesis (a tentative axiom or postulate) is probably not wrong. When scientists like Tim Leary, John Lilly, Richard Alpert, and Elmer Green encountered tacit metaphysical truth they often abandoned science in the pursuit of their own vision. Science provided them a springboard for their plunge into this arena, and they were aware of the consequences of the transition they made in moving from the domain of scientific truth to the domain of absolute truth. I believe they saw themselves more as point men trying to send back advanced notice of potential domains for exploration. Their scientific peers saw this as a fall from grace rather than early retirement. All scientists are driven by the pursuit of truth. There is a fear in the scientific community of flying too close to the sun and engaging metaphysics again. Unfortunately for those of weak heart quantum mechanics has already thrust us back into metaphysical debate (Hawking, 1988).

The field of neurotherapy feeds off of the latest research in neuropsychological and physics. This is our dilemma. We apply the latest research in a manner which most of the researchers providing us with this information have not even seriously considered. They cannot see us or hear us. We exist in the liminal realm of the cutting edge. What is most difficult is that this realm now embraces the point where science is trying to determine if the boundary between scientific truth and absolute truth is truly asmpyptotic. In our clinics where we walk this razors edge and the impossible seems to happen everyday, it requires great honesty and courage to continue the work. It may still be a hundred years before we begin to fully understand the mechanisms we are just beginning to employ. The circumstances force us to consider how far we can take our clients with this technology. This is the dilemma that faced Elmer Green and John Lilly. Peniston and Kulkosky have already crossed the line. We can hide the facts but we cannot take that back. Other civilizations have explored the realms we are encountering without benefit of the scientific process. This does not entirely disqualify their observations. Green, Peniston and Kulkosky, perhaps not entirely with full intention, have already proved the point. The most evolved and codified traditions of investigation in this realm can be surprisingly sophisticated at times. Benson, Davidson, Ekman and others are already establishing this empirically. I believe it is our job to pay close attention to their work and do what we do best- operationalize their findings for the benefit of those who suffer in our social order. We have the research, technology, and moral imperative to propel us along this trajectory.

Employing a meditational model for neurotherapy has powerful support in the research to date. It is one of many competing models. In my opinion a good neurotherapist has many tools in his bag, has learned how to use them, and employs them with the intent of "doing no harm." This chapter has attempted to provide a scientifically supported rational and method for employing a meditational model in the clinical setting. It is not always appropriate with all clients and with all situations. When the right occasion arrives, however, it is a very useful method to have at hand.